Well, I’m in my 4 th year of the programme of psychology of the Universidad de Chile and I have some complaints. I think that I haven’t developed skills that I need for work properly. In this programme the only concern is to learn theories and content, and sometimes a critical thought. So, I think that some changes are really necessary in this programme. In the first place , I think that is necessary organize practical activities since the first year and increase the option to intervene with the years of experience of the student. But it is important that these activities don’t correspond to a particular subject but to be transversal to the programme. This would allow the student to apply the things that have learn so far. Also these activities will prepare the student for the field work because will allow him/her to develop some skills that are beyond the theories. Also, I would eliminate some subjects that are really specifics for the firsts years, like “basic processes...
A really important national topical issue is the higher rates of immigration in Chile, which has been a very controversial topic because are a lot of people that aren’t happy with this phenomenon. If you check the statistics of the web page of the immigration department (Departamento de extranjería y migración, 2016) you can see that the immigration rates are increasing and that has scared Chilean people. But in the same document it says this numbers are lower than in other South American countries. So, what are the people so worried about? I think that this happen because is a new phenomenon that Balibar (in Balibar and Wallerstein, 1991) calls “neoracismo” (new racism) and it’s consist in the belief of the damage that can produce the lack of borders between countries. This belief is not based on biological heritage, but it is on the cultural differences that make life styles incompatible. I think that currently it’s very common to hear this kind of comments in Chilean people or rea...